FEATURED POST

Capital Punishment in the United States Explained

Image
In our Explainer series, Fair Punishment Project lawyers help unpackage some of the most complicated issues in the criminal justice system. We break down the problems behind the headlines - like bail, civil asset forfeiture, or the Brady doctrine - so that everyone can understand them. Wherever possible, we try to utilize the stories of those affected by the criminal justice system to show how these laws and principles should work, and how they often fail. We will update our Explainers monthly to keep them current. Read our updated explainer here.
To beat the clock on the expiration of its lethal injection drug supply, this past April, Arkansas tried to execute 8 men over 1 days. The stories told in frantic legal filings and clemency petitions revealed a deeply disturbing picture. Ledell Lee may have had an intellectual disability that rendered him constitutionally ineligible for the death penalty, but he had a spate of bad lawyers who failed to timely present evidence of this claim -…

'Disgraceful', Amnesty International says of Kho Jabing's hanging

Singapore's Changi Prison, where hangings are carried out
Singapore's Changi Prison, where hangings are carried out
"A cold state machinery that knows no compassion, that would rush a man to his death out of procedural efficiency."

Amnesty International condemned today the execution of Sarawakian Kho Jabing in Singapore that was carried out hours after his appeal against the sentence was rejected.

"It is disgraceful that Kho Jabing was executed, particularly with such indecent haste, after his final appeal was denied this morning," said Josef Benedict, deputy director of Amnesty International's South East Asia and Pacific Regional Office, in a statement.

"Clemency should have been granted, more so given the uncertainty and divided opinion surrounding Kho Jabing's fate over the past 6 years. Singapore is at a crossroads.

"It must decide whether it wants to join most of the world by protecting human rights and ridding itself of the death penalty, or remain among the minority of countries that insist on the implementation of this cruel and inhumane punishment," he added.

International newswire AFP reported Singapore police as confirming that 32-year-old Kho was hanged today, 6 years after he was sentenced to death in 2010 for murdering a construction worker.

Kho's case had sparked a renewed debate on the death penalty as he was re-sentenced to life imprisonment in 2013 after Singapore amended its mandatory death sentence for murder, but the prosecution appealed and the Malaysian's death sentence was reinstated in 2015.

Kirsten Han from Singapore anti-death penalty group We Believe in Second Chances said death row inmates should be seen as people who have made mistakes, bad decisions, and who might have been cruel but have families and struggles.

"The government says it kills people like Jabing to keep us safe.

"I don't know how Jabing's death has kept me safe; it's simply made me feel more hurt, more outraged and more fearful of a cold state machinery that knows no compassion, that would rush a man to his death out of procedural efficiency," Han wrote on Facebook.

The Star reported Malaysian Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nancy Shukri as saying in a written parliamentary reply Tuesday that Putrajaya has yet to decide on whether to amend the mandatory death penalty. Capital punishment in Malaysia is imposed on offences like murder and drug trafficking.

Source: themalaymailonline.com, May 21, 2016


Amnesty International urges Singapore to abolish death penalty

The risk of executing an innocent person can never be eliminated as long as the death penalty is kept on the law books.

Amnesty International (AI) has urged the authorities in Singapore, in a strongly-worded statement, to immediately halt all executions and commute all death sentences, as 1st steps towards the full abolition of the death penalty.

The execution of Kho Jabing marks a huge step backwards for Singapore which has reduced the implementation of the death penalty in recent years, added the statement. "Following the official moratorium on executions established in Singapore from 2012 to 2013, at least 13 people have had their death sentences reviewed and eventually commuted."

"New sentencing discretion has resulted in several individuals being spared the gallows."

AI was "strongly condemning" the sudden execution of Kho Jabing, undertaken with "shameful haste" on Friday. "The rushed execution, that occurred mere hours after his final appeal was rejected, marked a cruel and inhuman end to Kho Jabing's life after a 6 year legal battle in the courts."

In this instance, said AI, it also has strong concerns around the basis on which the death sentence of Kho Jabing was re-imposed, after a split decision in the courts. "In modern day Singapore, the answer to crime does not lie within the hangman's noose."

"Moreover, there's no evidence that the death penalty was more of a deterrent to crime than life imprisonment."

AI opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the nature of the crime. "The taking of another's life by execution is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment," said the statement. "The risk of executing an innocent person can never be eliminated as long as the death penalty is kept on the law books."

"Such practices violate the right to life, a fundamental right of every human being."

Furthermore, said AI, under international law and standards the use of the death penalty must be restricted to the "most serious crimes" which has been interpreted to mean intentional killing.

Kho Jabing, a Malaysian national, was executed at 3.30pm on 20 May 2016. Kho Jabing and a co-defendant were convicted of murder on 30 July 2010 and both were sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.

However, after the 2012 review of the mandatory death penalty laws, on 14 August 2013, the High Court found the murder to be non-intentional and resentenced Kho Jabing to life imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.

On 14 January 2015, the Court of Appeal re-imposed the death penalty on Kho Jabing in a 3-to-2 split decision.

An appeal admitted on 3 November 2015, 3 days before his scheduled execution, was dismissed on 5 April 2016.

Another last minute application by his lawyers, granted on 19 May 2016, resulted in a temporary stay of execution.

On the morning of 20 May 2016, Kho Jabing appeared in Court, hoping for a chance of reprieve. However, he was executed not long after this appeal was dismissed.

Source: freemalaysiatoday.com, May 21, 2016

- Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com - Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Most Viewed (Last 30 Days)

Harris County leads Texas in life without parole sentences as death penalty recedes

Idaho County commissioners take stand against death penalty

Texas: Reginald Blanton executed

30-year-old Chinese inmate bids farewell to daughter, wife and mother before execution

USA: Executions, Death Sentences Up Slightly in 2017

Indonesian death penalty laws to be softened to allow reformed prisoners to avoid execution

Japan hangs 2 inmates; first executions since July

Death penalty cases of 2017 featured botched executions, claims of innocence, 'flawed' evidence

Virginia Governor commutes death sentence of killer found mentally incompetent to be executed

Texas man with scheduled execution uses letters from fellow death row inmates to argue for reprieve