FEATURED POST

Unveiling Singapore’s Death Penalty Discourse: A Critical Analysis of Public Opinion and Deterrent Claims

Image
While Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) maintains a firm stance on the effectiveness of the death penalty in managing drug trafficking in Singapore, the article presents evidence suggesting that the methodologies and interpretations of these studies might not be as substantial as portrayed.

Singapore: Halt the execution of Kho Jabing

Kho Jabing
Kho Jabing
The Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (Adpan) urgently calls on the government of Singapore to halt the impending execution of 31-year-old Sarawakian Kho Jabing, whose application for clemency was rejected by the president of Singapore on Oct 19.

Kho Jabing was arrested in February 2008 for his participation in a robbery during which he hit a victim with a wooden stick or branch, resulting in the man's death. He was convicted in 2010 under Section 300c of Singapore's Penal Code, and his mandatory death sentence was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in 2011.

In 2013, amendments to Singapore's mandatory death penalty regime came into force, allowing Jabing the opportunity to be re-sentenced. Describing Jabing's actions as "opportunistic and improvisational", a High Court judge re-sentenced him to life imprisonment with 24 strokes of the cane.

However, the prosecution appealed and in January 2015 a 5-judge Court of Appeal reinstated the death sentence after deeming in a majority decision that Jabing had "exhibited a blatant disregard for human life".

It is important to note that Jabing's final death sentence was not passed with a unanimous decision, but a slim majority. 2 of the 5 appeal judges did not feel that the death penalty was appropriate for his crime, and felt that there was reasonable doubt as to the number of times and intensity with which Jabing had hit his victim that would affect any consideration of whether he had acted with a blatant disregard for human life.

The death penalty is the most final and irreversible of punishments. We cannot afford a single shred of doubt when a state condemns an individual to the gallows. Yet here we have the case of 3 learned judges - the High Court judge and 2 Court of Appeal judges - saying they did not believe capital punishment suitable in Jabing's case.

It is therefore unsafe to pass the ultimate sentence of death when doubt clearly exists even among Singapore's most esteemed legal professionals.

Adpan urges the president and the cabinet of Singapore to reconsider their decision not to grant Jabing clemency.

Source: malaysiakini.com, November 3, 2015

- Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com - Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

California | San Quentin begins prison reform - but not for those on death row

Missouri Supreme Court declines to halt execution of man who killed couple in 2006

Oklahoma | Death row inmate Michael DeWayne Smith denied stay of execution

Indonesia | Bali Prosecutors Seeking Death on Appeal

Ohio dad could still face death penalty in massacre of 3 sons after judge tosses confession

China | Former gaming executive sentenced to death in poisoning of billionaire Netflix producer

Iran | Couple hanged in the Central Prison of Tabriz