Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Update: Robert Pruett was executed by lethal injection on Thursday.
Robert Pruett is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas Thursday. He has never had a chance to live outside a prison as an adult. Taking his life is a senseless wrong that shows how badly the justice system fails juveniles.
Mr. Pruett was 15 years old when he last saw the outside world, after being arrested as an accomplice to a murder committed by his own father. Now 38, having been convicted of a murder while incarcerated, he will be put to death. At a time when the Supreme Court has begun to recognize excessive punishments for juveniles as unjust, Mr. Pruett’s case shows how young lives can be destroyed by a justice system that refuses to give second chances.
Mr. Pruett’s father, Sam Pruett, spent much of Mr. Pruett’s early childhood in prison. Mr. Pruett and his three siblings were raised in various trailer parks by his mother, who he has said used drugs heavily and often struggled to feed the children. Wh…

Singapore: Halt the execution of Kho Jabing

Kho Jabing
Kho Jabing
The Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (Adpan) urgently calls on the government of Singapore to halt the impending execution of 31-year-old Sarawakian Kho Jabing, whose application for clemency was rejected by the president of Singapore on Oct 19.

Kho Jabing was arrested in February 2008 for his participation in a robbery during which he hit a victim with a wooden stick or branch, resulting in the man's death. He was convicted in 2010 under Section 300c of Singapore's Penal Code, and his mandatory death sentence was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in 2011.

In 2013, amendments to Singapore's mandatory death penalty regime came into force, allowing Jabing the opportunity to be re-sentenced. Describing Jabing's actions as "opportunistic and improvisational", a High Court judge re-sentenced him to life imprisonment with 24 strokes of the cane.

However, the prosecution appealed and in January 2015 a 5-judge Court of Appeal reinstated the death sentence after deeming in a majority decision that Jabing had "exhibited a blatant disregard for human life".

It is important to note that Jabing's final death sentence was not passed with a unanimous decision, but a slim majority. 2 of the 5 appeal judges did not feel that the death penalty was appropriate for his crime, and felt that there was reasonable doubt as to the number of times and intensity with which Jabing had hit his victim that would affect any consideration of whether he had acted with a blatant disregard for human life.

The death penalty is the most final and irreversible of punishments. We cannot afford a single shred of doubt when a state condemns an individual to the gallows. Yet here we have the case of 3 learned judges - the High Court judge and 2 Court of Appeal judges - saying they did not believe capital punishment suitable in Jabing's case.

It is therefore unsafe to pass the ultimate sentence of death when doubt clearly exists even among Singapore's most esteemed legal professionals.

Adpan urges the president and the cabinet of Singapore to reconsider their decision not to grant Jabing clemency.

Source: malaysiakini.com, November 3, 2015

- Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com - Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Texas: Montgomery County DA asks governor to stay Anthony Shore's execution

Texas court halts execution to review claims that co-defendant lied at trial

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Alabama executes Torrey Twane McNabb

Texas: Houston Man Condemned in Family Murder Plot Loses High Court Appeal

Iran: Young man has hand judicially amputated over jewelry theft

Hours before execution, Tourniquet Killer granted 90-day stay at DA's request

Pakistan's angel of death

Why Indonesia Delays Execution of Death Row Convicts

The Execution Dock in London was used for more than 400 years to execute pirates, smugglers & mutineers