FEATURED POST

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Image
Update: Robert Pruett was executed by lethal injection on Thursday.
Robert Pruett is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas Thursday. He has never had a chance to live outside a prison as an adult. Taking his life is a senseless wrong that shows how badly the justice system fails juveniles.
Mr. Pruett was 15 years old when he last saw the outside world, after being arrested as an accomplice to a murder committed by his own father. Now 38, having been convicted of a murder while incarcerated, he will be put to death. At a time when the Supreme Court has begun to recognize excessive punishments for juveniles as unjust, Mr. Pruett’s case shows how young lives can be destroyed by a justice system that refuses to give second chances.
Mr. Pruett’s father, Sam Pruett, spent much of Mr. Pruett’s early childhood in prison. Mr. Pruett and his three siblings were raised in various trailer parks by his mother, who he has said used drugs heavily and often struggled to feed the children. Wh…

Ohio Considers Exempting Killers With Severe Mental Illness From Death Penalty

Laws already prohibit the execution of those deemed insane or mentally incompetent.

Convicted murderers who had a severe mental illness when they committed their crime would face a maximum punishment of life without parole instead of the death penalty under a proposed Ohio law.

The legislation, considered Wednesday by a state Senate committee, would apply to defendants who don't meet legal standards for insanity or mental incompetency, but nonetheless had diminished capacity to understand their crime because of a condition like schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, delusional disorder or major depression. The bill would apply to the 141 inmates currently on Ohio's death row, allowing the possibility of re-sentencing.

Several of the 31 states that have the death penalty have considered legislation to exempt people with severe mental illness from execution, but only Connecticut -- which has since abolished its death penalty -- enacted it. The modern criteria for who may executed has narrowed slightly in recent years, with the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 declaring it was unconstitutional to execute an inmate deemed mentally incompetent. The court barred the execution of juveniles in 2005.

"Individuals with serious mental illness have diminished criminal culpability, but Ohio law fails to protect them from imposition of the ultimate penalty of death," Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, a former state Supreme Court justice, told the state Senate Criminal Justice Committee Wednesday. "The 'evolving standards of decency' which prohibit the execution of juveniles and those with intellectual disabilities should prohibit execution of those with serious mental illness," Stratton said. Stratton said that "for nearly 20 years," she and other state Supreme Court justices questioned the appropriateness of executing capital defendants with demonstrated serious mental illness.

"Though it is legally a mitigating factor in sentencing, serious mental illness frequently functions as an aggravating factor in jurors' thinking," David Niven, a University of Cincinnati professor who researches the death penalty, told the committee.

Prosecutors who oppose the bill said current laws adequately deal with capital defendants who have mental illness. They argued that changing the law may make Ohio's death penalty subject to challenges based nebulous conditions like anxiety.

"This bill expands mental illness considerations far beyond what is necessary and will bar consideration of the death penalty in inappropriate circumstances," John Murphy, a lobbyist for the Ohio Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, wrote to lawmakers in an email earlier this year, according to The Associated Press.

A spokesman for Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine (R) said via email that the office has not taken a position on the legislation.

The bill would allow a defendant to raise the issue of severe mental illness before trial and give a judge the chance to remove the death penalty as a possible punishment. It would rule out leniency for crimes committed largely as the result of drug or alcohol abuse.

Source: The Huffington Post, Kim Bellward, October 16, 2015

Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Texas: Montgomery County DA asks governor to stay Anthony Shore's execution

Texas court halts execution to review claims that co-defendant lied at trial

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Texas: Houston Man Condemned in Family Murder Plot Loses High Court Appeal

Iran: Young man has hand judicially amputated over jewelry theft

Alabama executes Torrey Twane McNabb

Hours before execution, Tourniquet Killer granted 90-day stay at DA's request

Pakistan's angel of death

Why Indonesia Delays Execution of Death Row Convicts

The Execution Dock in London was used for more than 400 years to execute pirates, smugglers & mutineers