FEATURED POST

Unveiling Singapore’s Death Penalty Discourse: A Critical Analysis of Public Opinion and Deterrent Claims

Image
While Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) maintains a firm stance on the effectiveness of the death penalty in managing drug trafficking in Singapore, the article presents evidence suggesting that the methodologies and interpretations of these studies might not be as substantial as portrayed.

Iowa death penalty debate comes to an end

Rural Iowa
DES MOINES — The 2018 legislative debate over reinstating the death penalty in Iowa didn't last long.

One day after a sometimes-emotionally charged subcommittee discussion on a bill designed to provide a limited deterrent in situations in which someone aged 18 or older kidnaps, rapes and murders a minor or kills a peace officer in the line of duty, a key senator ended the topic.

“It’s not going to be run,” Sen. Brad Zaun, R-Urbandale, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told reporters after Tuesday’s committee meeting. “I’m putting it to rest.

“I don’t want to say any more than that. I’ve decided that it’s not going to go on the (Judiciary Committee) agenda either Wednesday or Thursday, so it will not be eligible to move on unless someone wants to do an amendment, which I can’t control. But in Judiciary, it will not be run.”

A five-member subcommittee had voted 3-2 on Monday to advance Senate Study Bill 3134 to full committee. But opponents wondered then if there would be enough votes to pass it in committee or on the Senate floor — especially after a death-penalty bill in the Iowa House had failed to clear the subcommittee level.

Friday marks the arrival of a self-imposed legislative deadline for non-money bills to clear a standing committee in the House or Senate to remain eligible for consideration this session.

Zaun’s decision to withhold SSB 3134 from committee consideration means it will fall victim to the “funnel” system and will be tabled for the 2018 session.

Sen. Jerry Behn, R-Boone, who has introduced a limited death penalty bill in each General Assembly since 1997, said he was disappointed but not surprised by the outcome.

“That’s too bad. I’ll just keep reintroducing it and we’ll see what happens,” Behn said. “I still think it’s appropriate. I think it’s the right thing to do and that’s the way the process works.

“Look, I’ve been doing this for years and you can’t get mad, you just have to say, if that’s the current situation, then the best I can do is bring it up again next year.”

Source: Quad-City Times, Rod Boshart, February 13, 2018


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

California | San Quentin begins prison reform - but not for those on death row

Missouri Supreme Court declines to halt execution of man who killed couple in 2006

Oklahoma | Death row inmate Michael DeWayne Smith denied stay of execution

Indonesia | Bali Prosecutors Seeking Death on Appeal

Ohio dad could still face death penalty in massacre of 3 sons after judge tosses confession

China | Former gaming executive sentenced to death in poisoning of billionaire Netflix producer

Iran | Couple hanged in the Central Prison of Tabriz