FEATURED POST

Unveiling Singapore’s Death Penalty Discourse: A Critical Analysis of Public Opinion and Deterrent Claims

Image
While Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) maintains a firm stance on the effectiveness of the death penalty in managing drug trafficking in Singapore, the article presents evidence suggesting that the methodologies and interpretations of these studies might not be as substantial as portrayed.

Proposition 62 Would Finally Halt The 'Machinery of Death' in California

San Quentin's brand new death chamber
San Quentin's brand new death chamber
45 years ago in a bone-chilling, blood-curdling cover story for The Los Angeles Free Press about California's gas chamber - "How Long Can You Hold Your Breath?" - author, musician and beatnik activist Ed Sanders, decried state-sponsored, taxpayer funded executions as a "ritual of filth." Sanders exhorted: "Isn't it time to crush that cruel nose-cone at San Quentin in the jaws of the nearest auto compactor or in the nearest junk yard?"

Close to half a century later - but, better late than never - when Californians head to the polls on Nov. 8, we can do just what Ed Sanders suggested: We can toss out what former Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun called our broken and vile 'machinery of death," relegating it to the dust-heap of our shared, dark, wayward humanity.

If we vote for Proposition 62 and against Proposition 66, we can finally be rid of the gruesome gas chamber which Sanders wrote, "drools for its next victim." It might surprise you to know this man-made room of depravity with its glistening, antiseptic floor, could under current California law, still be used.

And what about those grim, ghastly gurneys and the nasty life-sucking needles, no better than chemical nooses? They'll be gone for good if we just vote for Proposition 62 and against Proposition 66.

If we vote for Proposition 62 and against Proposition 66 (which promises to speed up executions, but underneath its sheen, is nothing more than 24 carat fool's gold), California can forever be free of the infamy of having executed an innocent person - that is, if we haven't done so already. With the too-large number of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted in California and nationally, a number that keeps rising as faithfully as the tide, it may be too late for us to prevent such an abomination - but what does it say about us as human beings if we don't act now to prevent more!?

My fellow citizens, if we just vote for Proposition 62 and against Proposition 66, finally, we can put an end to the extremely costly, time-sapping, never-ending death penalty appeals that have clogged and paralyzed our court system for decades, and that would do so even more under Proposition 66. If we just vote for Proposition 62 and against Proposition 66, we can end the ghoulish grandstanding over the procurement and planning by our elected officials to administer potentially defective, death-inducing drugs to our citizens - drugs that have the potential, as we've seen in recently botched executions around the country, to torture - thereby demeaning us all.

At least 18 death row inmates in California are out of appeals and ripe for execution; 730 more are in the pipeline, ready to follow suit. We can exterminate them all, and going forward we can choose to kill the many hundreds and thousands of Californians that will sadly, but as surely as human nature, take their place. We can do so in the name of so-called "justice," and on behalf of the great state of California.

Or, finally, as the Los Angles Free Press implored close to a half a century ago, we can as free Californians break from the yoke of state-endorsed murder - a vulgar practice of vengeance that has masqueraded far too long in this country as "justice."

If we do that - if we Californians vote for Proposition 62 and against Proposition 66 - we can fulfill the hopeful promise of our goodness as a people upon which the Eighth Amendment of our United States Constitution depends. In 1958, the Honorable Earl Warren, a native Californian, our state's 30th governor, and a former chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, wrote that the Eighth Amendment "must draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society." If we vote for Proposition 62 and against Proposition 66, our standards of decency will finally have evolved such that we can mark - I daresay, we can celebrate - the progress of the maturing society conscientious Californians long have craved.

Source: timesofsandiego.com, Stephen Cooper, July 24, 2016. Mr Cooper is a former Washington, D.C., public defender who worked as an assistant federal public defender in Alabama between 2012 and 2015.


⚑ | Report an error, an omission; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; send a submission; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running!


"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed, but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." - Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

California | San Quentin begins prison reform - but not for those on death row

Oklahoma | Death row inmate Michael DeWayne Smith denied stay of execution

Indonesia | Bali Prosecutors Seeking Death on Appeal

Iran | Couple hanged in the Central Prison of Tabriz

Ohio dad could still face death penalty in massacre of 3 sons after judge tosses confession

Singapore | Court of Appeal rejects 36 death row inmates’ PACC Act constitutional challenge

Tennessee | Nashville DA asks judge to vacate baby murder conviction following new medical evidence