Washington (CNN) -- The Supreme Court gave an Alabama death row prisoner another chance Wednesday to appeal his conviction after a mailroom mistake and other circumstances initially left him unable to pursue further claims in court.
At issue was whether a missed deadline to file a key appeal provided justification to grant Cory Maples a second chance, when the error was not the inmate's fault and the result would mean a punishment as serious as lethal injection.
The justices' 7-2 ruling was a setback for the state, and the inmate's case now goes back to lower courts.
"The uncommon combination of mishaps in Maples' case, we hold, provide just cause to excuse the procedural lapse in state court," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the majority.
The compounding series of errors and negligence involved both state officials and the private attorneys once representing him.
The prisoner's new legal team, supported by some civil rights groups, argued the criminal justice system was being turned on its head by potentially allowing prisoners to suffer the consequences of their lawyers' mistakes or incompetence.
Source: CNN, January 18, 2012
Related articles:
Oct 08, 2011
The case in question involves Cory R. Maples, an Alabama death row inmate who is facing execution because two lawyers at a New York law firm handling his appeal left their firm without notifying Maples or the state of ...
Oct 05, 2011
Alabama is a step from executing Cory Maples for a reason so grievously wrong that the case argued Tuesday at the Supreme Court should leave no doubt why the death penalty should be abolished. Besides being barbaric ...
Oct 15, 2011
The poll was conducted shortly after two controversial cases drew attention: the September execution of Troy Davis and last week's Supreme Court hearing involving Alabama death row inmate Cory Maples. Davis was ...
Mar 22, 2011
Lawyers at the firm, Sullivan & Cromwell, had agreed to represent Cory R. Maples, a death row inmate in Alabama, without charge. When an Alabama court sent two copies of a ruling in Mr. Maples's case to the firm in New ...

Comments
Post a Comment
Pro-DP comments will not be published.